My previous post comparing Roku and Nexus players made no “admission” whatsoever regarding the relative merits of the “development environments”.
In fact, my comparison specifically described the differences in their RUNTIME environments, interpreted versus compiled. Having not developed code for either platform, I have no basis to prefer or “admit” any preference for either development environment.
I have not offered any prior Roku to Nexus comparison comments until recently since I’'ve only owned and used a Nexus for a couple weeks.
Regarding your claim of my “impugning Tablo” and their development professionalism, I offer 2 simple statements. The first is that I have just purchased a second Tablo, so my personal and financial support for them is tangible and very recent.
Second comment is that their handling of numerous issues reflects a small, struggling, and immature company with great ambitions, a terrific concept, and far too many significant technical problems which persist month after month, in some cases worsening.
Even if you have never worked in a software development organization which has been certified to ISO 9001 quality standards or Carnegie Mellon Level 4 Maturity, you will understand what my comments refer to, the absence of software quality assurance being demmonstrated here in this and many other forum threads / complaints.
Take a look at this thread if you still have doubts: