[quote=“RetiredEngineer, post:113, topic:4337, full:true”]
All 2500+ channels are viewed by people who skip content, go back to review content, pause then restart content after a bathroom break with a rewind or fast forward, etc. Sport fans will know this as would parents of kids with typical attention defecit button pushing. With over 13 million viewers on Roku and 2500+ channels, PLEASE SHOW ME THEIR FAST FORWARD REBOOT COMPLAINTS. Even if only one 100th of 1% of the users reported an issue,there should be tens of thousands between April and now.
Where are they?
[/quote]A typical hour broadcast has 18 minutes of commercials. The ffw button on roku moves 10 seconds a click. Are you really trying to tell me that users of 2500 roku channels click the ffw button 108 clicks every hour? How small is your bladder that you have to pause a program to pee 108 times an hour? Can you give me some examples of channels where ffw is used 108 times an hour? From the times i’ve seen it crash the roku, it was never ever on the first click. Or even the first several clicks. It’s caused when using the ffw button a lot more frequently than you use it on other channels. So infrequently on other channels that when it happens, you’re not likely to report it on a roku forum. I’ve had rokus since 2011 and they’ve crashed numerous times. But I didn’t even know there were roku forums until a few months ago. When i’ve gone to roku’s page for support, I don’t recall there even being a link to the forums. So, infrequent crashes combined with hidden forums equals not a lot of reports when there is a problem.
If I can make roku crash using other channels, would you blame the all the channels I can make crash? I stopped using my roku 4 because it kept crashing and I wasn’t even using the tablo channel on it.
Edit: I see the roku forums have 89,676 registered users. Pretty small sample size of 13 million users, wouldn’t you say? 0.6% of those users registered on those forums. And you’re basing conclusions off of how many bug reports you see there? Come on. You have to see how unscientific that is.