Tablo – In a disaster it fails Tablo user’s needs completely!

If your DHCP server and NAT live on the ISP server it use to be very common for the DHCP server to stop if the internet link was down.

If the power didn’t go down but the DHCP server did tablo had functionality until the tablo IP lease renewal. Thus many offloaded the DHCP server onto a different router.

There is usually a difference between the ISP router uplink being down and an ISP node more removed being down. On some ISP routers you use to be able to plug the ISP router up link into a free input link and make the router think the link was good but a remote ISP node was down.

For people who live in areas with higher risk of tornados/hurricanes, placement of the Tablo and/or a coax run to a TV should be a consideration.

Although it may work for a period of time where do you find it’s not “internet dependent” ??

https://www.tablotv.com/blog/tablo-faqs-do-i-need-internet-use-tablo-ota-dvr/

https://www.tablotv.com/products/tablo-dual-lite-ota-dvr/#what-you-need

I grew up in the land of tornadoes before cable TV. Everyone had TV antennas. It was always fun to go outside after the storm and count how many antennas were bent in half.

I prefer a barometer and a storm cellar. When the barometric pressure hit 950 MB I ran for the storm cellar. The antop antenna can join Dorothy in the Land of OZ.

Really! You should have a better contingency plan than “I’ll just watch my tablo” …if investing in generators, another ~$100 for a 24" TV - because you didn’t run your coax to your primary TV, next to your tablo, for emergencies shouldn’t be an over reach.

If that’s part of your big picture plan - if only a handful have power from generators… is TV going to be the primary source for life saving information?

Time is relative, and it works long enough for me. :slight_smile:

That’s not the same as stating internet isn’t required for Roku users…

I agree, but that’s not what I stated.

Good luck, hope you find something that works for you.

1 Like

Bye.

“It’s not for Roku users.” Not sure how else to interpret this, but ok let’s move past it

I think you missed the adjective in front… ‘completely’.

…not wanting to move past then, ok help me avoid this in the future -

First comment was in full context was regarding “management decision” for internet dependency, complete or partial…
https://community.tablotv.com/t/tablo-in-a-disaster-it-fails-tablo-user-s-needs-completely/19893/16
stating it’s not for “Roku users”

Asked for references https://community.tablotv.com/t/tablo-in-a-disaster-it-fails-tablo-user-s-needs-completely/19893/23 citing tablo pages making it clear internet is necessary - no device exemptions.

https://community.tablotv.com/t/tablo-in-a-disaster-it-fails-tablo-user-s-needs-completely/19893/26 Say it works good enough for you - cool.

Still looking for tablo saying Roku users don’t always need internet… https://community.tablotv.com/t/tablo-in-a-disaster-it-fails-tablo-user-s-needs-completely/19893/27

Well, that’s not what you said… https://community.tablotv.com/t/tablo-in-a-disaster-it-fails-tablo-user-s-needs-completely/19893/28

I tried to follow, fine, let it go - https://community.tablotv.com/t/tablo-in-a-disaster-it-fails-tablo-user-s-needs-completely/19893/31

Well, no it all pivots on the adjective!? OK, where’s the documentation?? It may/does work… for some, for a period of time - officially tablo and from a support perspective you need an internet connection. Claiming an incomplete (partial) internet - where’s this documented??

I imply no offense, however, I don’t see a pivot, just a statement from the OP, to which I disagreed.
The documentation you requested may, or may not exist, however, my experience is real, whether it’s officially documented by the manufacturer, or not.

Humorous note about adjectives…
I can say I’m almost 6 feet tall.
Ignoring the adjective, I’m 6 feet tall, but that’s not true.
I wish it were true, but it’s not.